T-Rex vs I-Rex Who Wins?

Intelligence IS a factor in fights because the more intelligent animal is going to usually set the terms of engagement. Think of a Jaguar hunting a crocodile. The Jag knows it is overmatched in the water so it waits until the croc is on land where it has the advantage.

When people say 'bigger' they do often refer to weight but this is not always the case. I have seen many instances of it referring to length and height and while I agree that it is somewhat inaccurate it still gets the point across.

Yes, humans and chimps would more than likely be wrecked by any large carnivore, but as I am suggesting with I. rex humans use their intelligence to set the terms of engagement (ie; guns, traps, etc) and chimps are smart enough to stay out of harm's way. 

I am not suggesting that I. rex is going to bomb T. rex or anything but I do believe that it is smart enough to set the terms of engagement when it has the advantage.

Perhaps. Sure, it's most likely highly intelligent, but not a bloody genious. It'll try to ambush, and it may be able to pick up on an opponent's weak spot, but that's about it. There's no terrain that'll give it an advantage over T-Rex. The only pre-combat advantage she'll be getting is being up wind of T-Rex, but I'm pretty sure most predators can figure that out. 

They do.

Intelligence IS a factor in fights because the more intelligent animal is going to usually set the terms of engagement. Think of a Jaguar hunting a crocodile. The Jag knows it is overmatched in the water so it waits until the croc is on land where it has the advantage.

That's called specialized hunting, spinofan. Put a cheetah in that situation, it won't do such. Also, jaguars don't hunt crocodiles, they hunt the much smaller yacare caiman.

When people say 'bigger' they do often refer to weight but this is not always the case. I have seen many instances of it referring to length and height and while I agree that it is somewhat inaccurate it still gets the point across.

 It's still not the proper use of the term -- sie, again, refers to weight. not length and height.

I tell people the intelligence thing but they don't listen.

and I think I-rex is heavier so it is bigger.

TK, you think I-Rex is heavier, therefore you think it is bigger. Not you think its heavier, therefore it's bigger. That's what you meant. I also think I-Rex maxed out at larger than Rex. 

Yea I think I-rex is heavier. So it is bigger.

Alright then, whenever I think something, it is automatically fact. 

ummmm, no that is false.

Oh, I see what you did. I didn't mean. To put it like that.

You're speaking as though it's fact. 

"Yea I think I-Rex is heavier. So it is bigger."

That is speaking as though what you think is fact. Something a bit more suitable to say would be:

"Yeah, I think I-Rex is heavier, so I think it's bigger."

Sorry, didn't see your next comment. My bad.

It's alright. No ones perfect. I worded it the wrong way.

It happens. I know you worded it wrong, but some people reading may not be able to figure it out. 

Ya true.

Whoa! A lot happened while I was asleep! 

And Mr. Happy I know that it isn't bullet proof, but what I meant to say is just a thick hide, and I know he misses it, was going to put that in but Like I said I did it quickly.

;)

Now I am just going to read all the other comments :D

Here's a breakdown, thinking of this tactical wise.

The I-Rex is likely not as heavy. The pictures show a more streamlined body build. I'm guessing a solid 7 tons as opposed to the Tyrannosaur's 9. This is makes it easier to push around I-Rex.

The weapons of both are negated by each other. The thumbs won't help much, but the nasty claws of Indominus are probably the biggest weapon. However, the jaws of I-Rex are most likely better for leaving small, slashed wounds. The Rex could most likely withstand it. The Rex doesn't have claws worth crap, but jaws strong enough to decapitate the hybrid.

Remember, about the camo, the sense of smell might negate that, along with if the T-Rex gets a bite in. The bite can't camoflauge, leaving an exposed visible area.

I would say I-Rex: 60% of the time.

I believe that 'larger' here means longer, taller and heavier. I don't think T.rex has got any advantage in terms of size.

@Gigadino, Paleontologists use weight to determine size. Not height or length.

Yes, I'm aware of that. In fact I wrote 'here'. I meant that when JW guys say that I-rex is larger, they mean that it's longer, taller and heavier.