Jurassic World Argument

3675 Views22 Replies

Forum Topic

Nano-Rex3

MemberCompsognathusNov-30-2014 4:05 PM

After the Jurassic World trailer was released, Some scientists came foward and called the Film Makers out for "ignoring science" from how the dinosaurs look, No Feathers, Ever since the first JP, Science has suggested that Dinosaurs did have feathers and were not like how they appeared in the previous films (Well, the raptors had a little in the third but not that much) I think that it does'nt matter because this is how the dinosaurs were in the previous film and this is kinda a minor horror movie so everything does nothave to be scientificly accurate, but What do you guys Think?

Silver_Falcon
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

December 01, 2014

Actually, I just thought of a solution that makes everyone happy...

So, there are some new dinos in the park, right? And we know that one of these is Deinonychus, right? Well, If I recall correctly, Deinonychus wasn't a species originally on the island. Now, that would mean they, the masrani geneticists, would have to have created them, right?

So, what if they, based off of more recent scientific knowledge filled in the Deinonychus DNA with that of a, say, eagle? This would mean there are the Velociraptors, who have no feathers, and the Deinonychus, who do. This would provide the series purists with what they want and the scientific purists with what they want.

So, who's with me?

Here, have a waffle (-'.')-#