
x_paden_x
MemberCompsognathusMay-18-2014 10:26 PMCGI: Computer Generated Images
VS
Live Action Filming
(Example of Life Action, Involving Props, and/or Animatronics, Actors or Puppeteers can be used.)
Jurassic Park, did more then just Shead light on Dinosaurs... It Brought foreward a recent Technology, To its best... CGI.
The key to a Perfectly Balanced Film, Is to have both, But balanced...
But, Is JW Treading Dangerous territory? I ask you to look at the following evidence.
Case: 1:
This is nearly Impossible to build today. Not to mention it would cost Patel all his silver dollars (Or Should I say Pennies? *Canada Recently got rid of the penny, due to the price of Copper...*)
In this current day and age, If you don't have more then a day to build it, CGI it. In the First JP the tech was still fairly new. All of the sets, Were real. Speilburg kept true to it up to JP3, Although JP3 Had more CGI Then either of the films.
Now Colin has never really used CGI In any of his films, so there is obviously a sudden problem here. He doesn't know what is too much, and what is too little.
Now, there is other members from some of the original films working on it aswell But They are a minority, and if history has taught me anything, its the Minority, is usually ignored.
Case: 2
The Mono Rail... :I Most of this is planned to be CGI...
I find that colin has the sword unbalanced... Too much CG, And not enough Live action...
So, Now based on what I've provided... What do you think? Does colin have enough CG to Live Action?
Life cannot be contained, it breaks walls, crashes through barriers sometimes painfully, but uh... Life uh, finds a way