Rex killer

I was seeing that coming as another Rex vs. Spino thread. Thank God it didn't happen so.

BTW, that could happen, but I personally see Nano-T as a juvenile T-rex. That being said, basing off of what you said, some juveniles could be cannibals, haha.

I saw the title "Rex Killer" and thought this would be a Rex vs Spino, or something new of interest (a disease, or a new north American super predator, for example). Everyone on this forum knows what a Nanotyrannus is, what it did, and it's size and role. I personally have known about NanoT since I was 10.

I see NanoT as a species of it's own. Different teeth (thinner, more knifelike), different posture (head slanted down, not parallel to the ground).

Well, it's still a juvenile for me (even T-rex adult specimens are always different to one another. And I'm not talking about size)

But, oh well, Nano-T as a species on its own isn't excluded, so I respect your point of view.

Exactly, and I respect yours. I see the Juvenile thing as plausible though (it doesn't hurt to look at things from both sides). I know about the differences, but that's not so much posture as it is body variations (small feet and large eye sockets, large nasal passages and oddly positioned legs, not sure of other things though,  those were two that came to mind).

Yeah, I'm not loosing anything -

And yes, there are some differences.

That's fine. I'm not changing my opinion either, but hey, debates like this are fun, as long as we keep our cool and dont take it too far.

New kid, we dont "know" if trex is the king of the dinosaurs. Just throwing that out because that there is what ignites these outrages ;)

True. You can get to some good results through debates that, as you said, don't need to go too far away. Some of the best theories are created that way. ;)

We just say "King" because that's what Rex translates too. If Spino had "Rex" at the end, we would most likely refer to Spino as "The King," and he who gets annoyed when Rex is refered to as "The King," would be calling Spino "The King." It's all in the meaning, that's what I go by at least.

Apparently your not looking at what im lookin at, the DASPLETOSAURUS guys said in exact words "we all know Tyrannosaurus was the king of the dinosaurs".

Sorry. I saw that, I was just giving an explanation for future reference.

See Nano-Tyranus is a very different the our every day T-rex it has a highy toxic bite the could kill a rex within a few minutes if got a e rexs it hold of the legs. It also with more study about Nano-Tyranus it was found to have serrated teeth in the front along with the dagger like teeth like T-rex.

Im going by what I study and if Im not mistaking T-rex was the most highly advanced carnivore of its time after we found out that Rex could hunt in pack up to 3-4 of them including their young. There for Rex was "King" of the dinosaurs do to all others feared it.

NanoT was about one thousand pounds in weight, twenty or so feet long, and seven feet tall (give or take). I HIGHLY doubt it had a poisonous bite. It had a bite that was about 500 PSI (give or take), enough to kill a young Rex (equal size or smaller), and enough to piss off an adult. NanoT was probably a scavenger, and it may have had an INFECTIOUS bite, not toxic bite.

About the King thing, just don't, most people accept Rex as the King of the Dinosaurs, but there are a few who HATE Rex more than a small child hates vegetables, so don't call Rex King  of the Dinosaurs. I still call him "The King," but that's it.

Well, everything you said could very well be true, as for the lowering of the population though..well, that didn't work very well did it? NanoT is fairly rare in the fossil record whereas T.rex is comparably common as dirt. It seems like, despite all this attention Nano gets as a "T.rex killer" it was quite clearly being out-competed by it's larger relative & smaller Dromaeosaurs & Troodontids. 

Length      17 feet (5m)

Weight       1ton (900kilo)

But this smaller Tyrannosaurus isnt afraid to take on the Tyrannt Lizard King

We can't leave out the study of this rare dinosaur. scientists have found out that Nano-Tyranus had an toxic in its mouth is like a Kamodo it weakens their pray in order to kill it. They in fact did hunt and kill young juveniles to lower Trex population but if it didnt go as plan the Nano would be killed by the adult or had to flee to live another day.

I doubt its poisonous, but Nanotyrannus is a very possible killer if baby T. rex. Also, Mrhappy, I thought Nano-T had a bite of around 900 lbs.

Lets use the Kamodo and its saliva has a toxic in it to paralysis the animal it wounded now NanoTyrannus had that same toxic in its saliva this would help it in fighting the Tyrannosaurus rex it would slow it down but lethal on the first bite. Now the NanoTyrannus had more speed the Trex to get around it. But the down fall is to NanoTyrannus was the fact that it would mess with the juvenile rexs which led to its own death if it didt not leave the nesting site. Trex would had have the biggest advantage do to its size and strangth.

Buddy, no offence, but there's absolutely no evidence for NanoT having a toxic bite, or any Dinosaur being venomous. Nanotyrannus killing baby Tyrannosaurus? Yeah, sure, probably. It makes sense. However, the Jurassic Fight Club idea of Nanotyrannus homing in on Tyrannosaur nests to kill the infants? No, that'd be suicide, I doubt both parents would leave the infants alone & if the idea of Tyrannosaurs living in extended family groups is correct it's likely that atleast one adult or sub-adult would be around to look after the infants at all times. Nanotyrannus didn't have a toxic bite, and it wasn't a juvenile T.rex. Fossil record seems to show that it was pretty thin on the ground and probably, as a species, on it's last legs due to competition from other predators.

I know that but im basing it off of the fossil records in Cleveland I help the run xray on the bones on the dinosaur and im looking forward to dig up and finding new speices of dinosaurs and im only 17.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I'd like to see some sources for the toxins in Nano.

Also, when Komodo dragons use their "poison", they only bite the animal once and then wait for it to die, which could take days. It would be near useless in an immediate fight.

Thank you thats what I've been trying to say.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I was asking for sources on the Nanotyrannus poison. You said it had been discovered, but I've never heard of it.

Its saliva like trex its very infectious when it bites down on its pray

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I'm not sure you're understanding me: I'm asking for proof of the Nanotyrannus saliva. You're the first person to tell me this, so I would appreciate some sources.

Also, the T .rex saliva has already been disputed.

Look the NanoTyrannus is just a smaller Trex and it has the same saliva as Trex. That is what has been proven this smaller cousin of Tyrannosaurus Rex used this saliva just like Trex by infecting its pray or killing it ether way the animal is dead.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

No, it doesn't. You haven't given me any proof for the saliva on the Nano, and I already told you that poisonous saliva for Rex has already been disputed.

look i wanted to interduce Trex cousin NanoTyrannus and how they were different and alike but you think that the saliva in Trex mouth is diferent then NanoTyrannus well go study on the different types of Tyrannosauridae and then comment back.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

Have you read anything I've posted? I already told you, there is no evidence for poisonous saliva on T .rex, and there isn't any on Nanotyrannus either.

Also, let's test YOUR knowledge on tyrannosauroids, so answer these questions please:

1: Which is the oldest known tyrannosaurid?

2: Name 2 tyrannosaurids which are known to be feathered.

1. The Lythronax is the oldest do to the tyrannosaurid only appeared 70 million years ago, and the Lythronax evolved 10 million years earlier.

2. One is the Dilong Paradoxus and the other one is Yutyrannus

@DASPLETOSAURUS

Good, you know your tyrannosaurids.

However, I already told you, it has already been proven that T .rex did not have poisonous saliva. Not only that, but there is zero evidence for Nano having poisonous saliva.

Ok

Alrighty then, good debate.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I understand your intentions, but most people who are into Dinosaurs know who Nanotyrannus is, so you don't really need to "introduce" it to us. Secondly, there is no evidence of toxic saliva in any Dinosaurs. Could a bite cause an infection? probably, yeah. But as has been stated, such an ability would be absolutely pointless in a fight, becase it would take days or even weeks for the prey to succumb to the infection. Komodo dragons & other monitor lizards are actually venomous, they have venom glands like their close relatives, the Snakes. So the septic bite is something of an un-intended side effect of tooth serrations and meat diet.